The latest US-led strike in the South American nation and the detention of its leader have renewed unease regarding Washington's designs on Greenland. Supporters of the ex-president's base have allegedly focused on the resource-rich landmass following the events in the southern hemisphere.
Merely hours after the commencement of the Venezuelan campaign, a well-known conservative commentator, who is the spouse of a senior White House adviser, shared a symbolic image. The picture showed Greenland covered in the American flag, with the cryptic caption: "SOON."
This blatant suggestion to annex the resource-abundant land, which is a member of the NATO alliance, provoked swift and strong condemnation from Danish representatives.
"Denmark and the US are close allies and should continue to work together as such. US security is equally the Arctic's and Denmark’s security," stated the Danish ambassador to the United States. "The Kingdom of Denmark and the US work together to ensure security in the North."
The ambassador additionally pointed out that the kingdom had significantly increased its defence spending recently, allocating a large amount specifically for Northern and regional security. "Furthermore, we demand full recognition for the sovereign borders of the our realm," he emphasized.
The situation were additionally complicated by the recent appointment of a US state governor as a special envoy to Greenland. The appointee had openly expressed gratitude to the president, stating it was an "honour" to work in a volunteer role to "bring Greenland into the US."
After the events in Venezuela, this representative praised the president's decisive move, connecting it to the broader "fight against narcotics."
Since returning to office, the American leader has repeatedly unnerved European allies with his stated interest in Greenland. The island is viewed as vitally strategic for national security and potential mineral exploitation. It already houses the most northerly US military base.
In a significant television appearance, the president declined to exclude the use of armed action to acquire Greenland. This stance comes during intensifying great-power competition in the polar region. "I don't rule it out. I don't say I'm going to do it, but I don't rule out anything... We need Greenland very badly," he stated.
He described Greenland as having a "very small amount of people, which we’ll take care of, and we’ll value them... But we need that for international security."
In response to this constant "rhetoric" of intent, Danish intelligence service took the unprecedented step last month of labelling the United States as a "security risk."
The leaders of both Greenland delivered a unified and forceful statement: "We have said it very clearly before. Now we say it again... You cannot take over other countries."
Surveys in Greenland shows a complex picture. While a overwhelming percentage of the territory's inhabitants desire independence from Denmark, there is simultaneously little to no appetite to join the United States. The island has had the option to seek sovereignty for over a decade.
Some analysts are now reconsidering the possibility of such a action. One thinktank director focusing in defence admitted she had once dismissed the rhetoric but was "currently not so sure."
"Logistically, it would be feasible for the US to station a few hundred or a few thousand soldiers inside of Greenland, and it's not clear to me which power could intervene about it," she concluded.